No " No-go "

In spite of the very common opinion we show that QM is not complete and that it is possible to create prequantum models providing finer description of physical reality than QM. There exists (at least in theoretical models) dispersion free states and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. Thus in spite of all " No-Go " theorems Bell) we found a realist basis of quantum mechanics. I think that our model would totally satisfy A. Einstein who was sure that QM is not complete and a finer description is possible. Our representation is not standard model with hidden variables. In particular , this is not a reduction of the quantum model to the classical one. Moreover, we see that such a reduction is even in principle impossible. This impossibility is not the consequence of a mathematical theorem but it follows from the physical structure of the model. By our model quantum states are very rough images of domains in the space of fundamental parameters-PRESPACE. Those domains represent complexes of physical conditions. By our model both classical and quantum physics describe REDUCTION of PRESPACE-INFORMATION. As we have already mentioned, QM is not complete. In particular, there are prespace contexts which can be only represented by a so called hyperbolic quantum model. 1. " Classical " and " quantum " probabilities. The starting point of our considerations was the comparative analysis of so called classical and quantum probabilities. Such an analysis was performed in my book [1]